Urgh. Actually, I did write an article - to be found here (http://news.nana.co.il/Article/?ArticleID=176719&sid=126) - which said that Iraq voting may change the middle east. For the life of me, I cannot understand how writing that the revolution in Lebannon would not have happened without the occupation of Iraq is tantamount to "ignoring eight million Iraqi voters". I guess that comes from being a leftist possuer. The news outlet I work for has extensively covered the Iraqi elections. I, personally, saw it almost as a religious experience. My colleague and friend, Itamar Shaltiel, covered it well here - http://news.nana.co.il/Article/?ArticleID=170698&sid=126. However, I have since changed my mind regarding Iraq. There was always a chance Iraq would be the doom of the war against Islam-fascism, and recent events prove that, unfortunately, we're losing. And, og, if you don't like my interpretation of 242 ("from the teeritories" instead of "from territories", you can try your hand at explaining Israel's refusal to abide by 194. I can certainly see why it does - hell, I fully agree - but to ignore it, and other decisions, means you can't bloody well use the fact that other countries ignore the security council as an argument. House of glass and all that.